<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentaris a: junyent.org COinS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://junyent.org/2007/02/25/junyentorg-coins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://junyent.org/2007/02/25/junyentorg-coins/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ll send an SOS to the world....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Per: Trapti</title>
		<link>http://junyent.org/2007/02/25/junyentorg-coins/comment-page-1/#comment-96232</link>
		<dc:creator>Trapti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junyent.org/2007/02/25/junyentorg-coins/#comment-96232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read Ulysses once and loved it.  I satrted out reading the novel along with Richard Ellman&#039;s bio of Joyce (many regard it as the best bio written in the last century, and it is indeed truly outstanding) and Gifford&#039;s  Ulysses Annotated.   I abandoned the Giffords book midstream, however, and turned instead to the Ulysses chapter in Nabokov&#039;s  Lectures on Literature  as a guide.  This was the best decision I could have made, and I don&#039;t know that I would have finished the novel without it.  Whereas the massive Giffords book bogged me down with all the (admittedly impressive) detail, using Nabokov&#039;s much shorter lectures as a guide was pure pleasure.  Maybe you won&#039;t catch all the references Joyce put into the book this way, and maybe you&#039;ll disagree with some of his conclusions about Ulysses (as I recall, N. is convinced that the mysterious man in the macintosh was Joyce himself), but seriously, you can&#039;t ask for a wittier or more engaging companion that Nabokov. I felt like I was reading the book along with him. Very highly recommended!  In any case, good luck, and enjoy, no matter which guide you choose!  I hope you&#039;ll share your thoughts on the book as you progress!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read Ulysses once and loved it.  I satrted out reading the novel along with Richard Ellman&#8217;s bio of Joyce (many regard it as the best bio written in the last century, and it is indeed truly outstanding) and Gifford&#8217;s  Ulysses Annotated.   I abandoned the Giffords book midstream, however, and turned instead to the Ulysses chapter in Nabokov&#8217;s  Lectures on Literature  as a guide.  This was the best decision I could have made, and I don&#8217;t know that I would have finished the novel without it.  Whereas the massive Giffords book bogged me down with all the (admittedly impressive) detail, using Nabokov&#8217;s much shorter lectures as a guide was pure pleasure.  Maybe you won&#8217;t catch all the references Joyce put into the book this way, and maybe you&#8217;ll disagree with some of his conclusions about Ulysses (as I recall, N. is convinced that the mysterious man in the macintosh was Joyce himself), but seriously, you can&#8217;t ask for a wittier or more engaging companion that Nabokov. I felt like I was reading the book along with him. Very highly recommended!  In any case, good luck, and enjoy, no matter which guide you choose!  I hope you&#8217;ll share your thoughts on the book as you progress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

